New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000249
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 04:55
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 629 / 1000
Tonal balance202 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity176 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape50 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics137 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness64 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.6 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
33.0 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization89 %
Strong background noise — turn off the engine and ventilation, close the windows

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −13.4 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 12 kHz (up to −12.8 dB)
High noise in the recording
SNR ≈ 0.3 dB

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −10.6 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.6 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.3 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)88.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity91.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)64.2 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score629 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
2 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording10.43 s
Compared segment0:36
Correlation0.421
Peak sharpness (PSR)63.6
Clock drift+30.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR89 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−23.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio0.3 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.5 dB
Recording fileRecording_21.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−19.3
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−8.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−8.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−18.9
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−23.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB14.2 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.6 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance33.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz88.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor91.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz64.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination629 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −10.6 dB · significant, match 17%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.3 dB · small, match 68%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.4 dB
RMS L / R−23.3 / −22.9 dB
Peak L / R−8.9 / −8.9 dB
L/R correlation0.393
L/R delay+0.39 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −18.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −17.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −14.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −7.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +0.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +2.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.6 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.9 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence 0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −9.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −17.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.