New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000298
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 11:50
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 584 / 1000
Tonal balance217 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity117 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape54 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics125 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness71 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
36.0 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization86 %
Strong background noise — turn off the engine and ventilation, close the windows

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +9.4 dB)
Dip in the region
630 Hz – 2.5 kHz (up to −7.4 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 400 Hz (up to +5.9 dB)
High noise in the recording
SNR ≈ 0.3 dB

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.5 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.8 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.9 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.4 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity72.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)58.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity83.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)71.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score584 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 630 Hz – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.8
Mid: 200 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
High: 8 – 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 8 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording19.50 s
Compared segment0:27
Correlation0.366
Peak sharpness (PSR)87.3
Clock drift+22.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR86 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−21.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio0.3 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.4 dB
Recording fileГолос 261110_134936.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−18.2
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−5.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−4.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−17.9
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−20.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB15.4 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.6 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance36.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges72.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz58.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor83.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz71.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination584 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.5 dB · noticeable, match 47%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.8 dB · small, match 62%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−4.3 dB
RMS L / R−23.4 / −19.0 dB
Peak L / R−9.4 / −5.3 dB
L/R correlation0.591
L/R delay+0.11 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−4.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −23.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −0.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +9.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +9.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +6.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −2.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +5.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −5.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −4.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −6.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −4.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +3.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +3.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −7.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.