New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000278
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 10:12
Participant: Андрей
Car: Haval F7
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 700 / 1000
Tonal balance229 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity105 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics96 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour78 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness56 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
90.6 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −41.7 dB)
Strong bass excess
50 – 160 Hz (up to +7.0 dB)
Strong midrange boost
2 – 4 kHz (up to +5.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.6 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.3 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −3.0 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity76.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)52.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)77.7 %
Dynamic similarity64.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)55.8 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score700 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Low: 50 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.8
Mid: 2 – 4 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Mid: 630 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 630 Hz – 1.25 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and highs for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.153
Track start in the recording5.09 s
Compared segment2:11
Correlation0.173
Peak sharpness (PSR)58.1
Clock drift−38.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−65.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio48.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.83Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.9 dB
Recording fileНовая запись.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−15.3
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−3.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−12.2
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB14.5 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.8 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB9.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges76.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz52.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor64.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time77.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz55.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination700 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.3 dB · noticeable, match 58%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −3.0 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −3.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −1.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +3.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.8 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −2.2 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −1.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +5.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −7.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +3.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +3.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +5.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance 0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −7.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −9.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −56.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.