New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000190
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 16:40
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Subaru
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 709 / 1000
Tonal balance227 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity153 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape111 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics75 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness50 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
74.1 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong midrange boost
200 – 500 Hz (up to +10.0 dB)
Strong treble excess
above 8 kHz (up to +9.7 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +8.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −1.5 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.1 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.7 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity75.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)76.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.8 %
Dynamic similarity49.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)49.6 %
Stereo stage width108 %
Overall score709 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 200 – 500 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −5…8 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6
High: above 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 8 kHz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
Mid: 630 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 3.15 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.451
Track start in the recording4.07 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.021
Peak sharpness (PSR)183.5
Clock drift+15.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−68.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio46.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.24Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+11.6 dB
Recording fileIMG_4085.mov

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−19.5
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−5.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−5.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−17.2
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−22.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB16.6 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB8.1 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB11.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance74.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges75.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz76.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor49.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz49.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination709 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.1 dB · small, match 70%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.7 dB · small, match 64%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.1 dB
RMS L / R−22.2 / −22.1 dB
Peak L / R−5.6 / −5.6 dB
L/R correlation0.727
L/R delay−0.33 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −17.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.8 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +6.6 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +9.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +5.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −4.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +5.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +9.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +1.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.