New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000183
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 15:29
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Памагитииии
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 547 / 1000
Tonal balance154 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity128 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape66 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics55 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour87 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness57 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
43.8 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong treble excess
above 8 kHz (up to +14.6 dB)
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −10.1 dB)
Strong treble excess
4 – 8 kHz (up to +8.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.1 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.4 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.5 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +7.0 dB strong excess

Additional metrics

Band similarity51.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.5 %
Dynamic similarity36.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)56.7 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score547 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 8 kHz, −6…12 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
High: 4 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.5
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 3.15 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs, sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.452
Track start in the recording6.63 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.384
Peak sharpness (PSR)46.1
Clock drift+26.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−73.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio52.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.42Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.3 dB
Recording file20261109_182637.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−18.1
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−4.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−15.9
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−20.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB16.7 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB6.3 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB11.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance43.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges51.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor36.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz56.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination547 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.1 dB · noticeable, match 51%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.4 dB · noticeable, match 57%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.5 dB · small, match 66%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +7.0 dB · significant, match 31%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −10.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +6.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.8 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” 0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −4.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −5.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −7.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −9.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +4.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +7.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +5.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +5.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +10.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +14.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +9.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.