New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000250
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 05:03
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 755 / 1000
Tonal balance204 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity174 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape141 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics120 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour89 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness27 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
93.9 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 16 kHz (up to −13.3 dB)
Dip in the region
4 – 10 kHz (up to −5.8 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −7.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −5.8 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.9 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.4 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −3.7 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)87.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)88.6 %
Dynamic similarity80.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)27.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score755 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 16 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +7…8 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 16 kHz)
High: 4 – 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.3
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 100 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass and highs for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.753
Track start in the recording4.04 s
Compared segment2:11
Correlation0.511
Peak sharpness (PSR)82.7
Clock drift+40.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−60.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio40.8 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.22Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.4 dB
Recording fileRecording_22.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−17.6
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−3.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−3.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−14.7
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−20.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB16.8 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB5.0 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB11.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz87.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor80.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time88.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz27.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination755 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −5.8 dB · noticeable, match 38%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −3.7 dB · noticeable, match 54%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.4 dB
RMS L / R−20.2 / −19.9 dB
Peak L / R−4.0 / −3.3 dB
L/R correlation0.565
L/R delay+0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −14.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −3.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” 0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity 0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.8 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −4.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −10.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −20.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.