New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000188
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 16:19
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Subaru forester sh
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 572 / 1000
Tonal balance201 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity126 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape56 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics79 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour92 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness18 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.4 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
37.2 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization95 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong treble excess
3.15 – 16 kHz (up to +15.4 dB)
Dip in the region
630 Hz – 1 kHz (up to −11.8 dB)
Dip in the region
50 – 80 Hz (up to −7.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.0 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.6 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +8.2 dB strong excess

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.3 %
Dynamic similarity52.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)18.0 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score572 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 3.15 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 8 kHz, −5…10 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
Mid: 630 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Low: 50 – 80 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Low: 100 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 200 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.551
Track start in the recording5.62 s
Compared segment1:22
Correlation0.109
Peak sharpness (PSR)135.1
Clock drift−15.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR95 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−67.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio43.2 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.06Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+10.7 dB
Recording fileБагряная улица.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.2−20.0
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−3.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.6−16.6
RMSaverage power−14.3 dB−24.0 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB20.4 dB
LRAloudness range10.5 dB9.7 dB
DRdynamic range8.5 dB13.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance37.2 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor52.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz18.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination572 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.0 dB · small, match 71%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +8.2 dB · significant, match 26%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −14.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −5.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” 0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −9.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +4.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +7.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +8.6 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +15.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +6.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +7.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +8.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −46.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.