New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000316
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:26
Car: Honda cr-v. 3way.
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 640 / 1000
Tonal balance153 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity137 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape94 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics96 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour94 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness66 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.8 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
62.5 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −24.9 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −20.2 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 2 kHz (up to −6.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −21.6 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −3.0 dB reduced
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −4.1 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity50.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)68.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.6 %
Dynamic similarity63.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)65.8 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score640 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Sub: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +11…12 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +7…8 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Mid: 1.6 – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Mid: 630 – 800 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 800 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:03.551
Track start in the recording6.44 s
Compared segment2:08
Correlation0.506
Peak sharpness (PSR)107.5
Clock drift+18.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−63.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio37.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: +0.08Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.8 dB
Recording file10 нояб., 20.23​.mp3

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.3−22.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−4.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−4.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−18.2
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−25.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB21.4 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB6.7 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB14.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance62.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges50.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz68.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor63.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz65.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination640 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −21.6 dB · significant, match 3%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −3.0 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −4.1 dB · noticeable, match 51%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.1 dB
RMS L / R−25.8 / −25.6 dB
Peak L / R−4.3 / −4.7 dB
L/R correlation0.418
L/R delay−0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −21.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −25.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −25.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −17.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −12.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −2.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body 0.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −3.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +0.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +5.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −4.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −5.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +1.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −18.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −8.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −8.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −19.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.