New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000136
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 07:28
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 543 / 1000
Tonal balance226 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity139 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape26 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics142 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness10 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
17.3 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization86 %
Strong background noise — turn off the engine and ventilation, close the windows
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 16 kHz (up to −13.4 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −7.7 dB)
Dip in the region
1.25 – 2 kHz (up to −5.5 dB)
High noise in the recording
SNR ≈ 0.6 dB

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −5.4 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.4 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.9 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity75.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)69.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity94.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)10.4 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score543 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 16 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 16 kHz)
Low: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1.25 – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Low: 160 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.255
Track start in the recording21.21 s
Compared segment0:28
Correlation0.229
Peak sharpness (PSR)75.9
Clock drift+143.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR86 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−32.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio0.6 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+16.7 dB
Recording fileRecording_5.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−27.9
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−18.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−18.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−27.6
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−32.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB14.1 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.4 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance17.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges75.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz69.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor94.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz10.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination543 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −5.4 dB · noticeable, match 41%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.9 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −14.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −12.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −8.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −4.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +0.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.9 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −4.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −4.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +3.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −8.9 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −20.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.