New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000328
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:48
Participant: Jcd
Car: —
Microphone: Phone + external microphone
Overall quality
Total: 601 / 1000
Tonal balance168 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity122 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape107 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics78 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour89 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness37 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.6 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
71.5 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
Noticeable background noise
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 200 Hz (up to +10.6 dB)
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −10.8 dB)
Strong treble excess
8 – 16 kHz (up to +6.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.7 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +5.6 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.5 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.5 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity56.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)61.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)89.0 %
Dynamic similarity51.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)37.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score601 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 200 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 200 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.8
High: 8 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Mid: 1.6 – 2 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0
Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.254
Track start in the recording2.87 s
Compared segment1:04
Correlation0.474
Peak sharpness (PSR)65.3
Clock drift−111.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−58.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio19.7 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.42Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+23.7 dB
Recording filePXL_20261110_124536579~2.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−37.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−16.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−16.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−32.8
RMSaverage power−17.7 dB−38.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.7 dB22.0 dB
LRAloudness range6.6 dB4.8 dB
DRdynamic range11.9 dB12.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance71.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges56.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz61.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor51.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time89.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz37.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination601 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.7 dB · noticeable, match 54%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +5.6 dB · noticeable, match 39%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.5 dB · small, match 66%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.5 dB · small, match 66%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+53.3 dB
RMS L / R−35.7 / −89.1 dB
Peak L / R−16.8 / −68.8 dB
L/R correlation−0.002
L/R delay+0.45 ms
Polarityout of phase!
Balance shift vs original+53.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +3.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +0.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +3.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +3.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +9.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +8.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.8 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −1.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −8.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.6 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −4.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −6.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −7.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −6.8 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +4.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +3.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity 0.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +3.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +5.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +6.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −48.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.