New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000232
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 21:24
Participant: ЮРИЙ Ц.
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 780 / 1000
Tonal balance228 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity167 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape140 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics103 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness49 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.8 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
93.5 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +8.8 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −7.9 dB)
Slight treble excess
5 – 8 kHz (up to +4.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.4 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.5 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.3 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity76.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.9 %
Dynamic similarity68.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)49.3 %
Stereo stage width112 %
Overall score780 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
High: 5 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording3.08 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.430
Peak sharpness (PSR)320.4
Clock drift−1.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−65.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio43.4 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.35Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.4 dB
Recording file20261110_001920.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−20.4
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.7
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−22.0 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB19.0 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.2 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB13.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges76.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor68.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz49.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination780 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.4 dB · noticeable, match 56%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.5 dB · noticeable, match 56%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.0 dB
RMS L / R−21.5 / −22.5 dB
Peak L / R−2.9 / −3.9 dB
L/R correlation0.849
L/R delay−0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −3.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −2.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −1.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +8.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +5.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +2.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.9 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.