New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000184
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 15:56
Participant: Борис
Car: Белый Haval F7 198
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 824 / 1000
Tonal balance275 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity152 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape143 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics120 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness41 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.3 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
95.0 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Slight treble excess
10 – 16 kHz (up to +3.8 dB)
Slight midrange boost
800 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to +4.4 dB)
Slight dip
200 – 250 Hz (up to −4.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.5 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.7 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.9 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.0 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity91.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)75.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.3 %
Dynamic similarity80.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)40.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score824 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 10 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Mid: 800 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
Low: 200 – 250 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 200 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.252
Track start in the recording0.57 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation−0.016
Peak sharpness (PSR)67.8
Clock drift−31.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−39.6 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.07Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+10.6 dB
Recording filevideo_20261109_183039.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−25.6
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−8.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−8.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−22.3
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−28.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB20.0 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB5.6 dB
DRdynamic range12.3 dB13.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance95.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges91.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz75.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor80.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz40.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination824 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+2.0 dB
RMS L / R−27.3 / −29.3 dB
Peak L / R−8.2 / −10.0 dB
L/R correlation0.641
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −8.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −4.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −0.5 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −1.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +0.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −4.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” 0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +4.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance 0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +3.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +3.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −1.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.