New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000222
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 19:49
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 822 / 1000
Tonal balance249 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity143 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics113 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness86 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
15.0 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
90.6 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +5.2 dB)
Dip in the region
315 – 630 Hz (up to −5.2 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +5.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.6 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.6 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.4 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.2 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity82.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)71.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)94.7 %
Dynamic similarity75.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)85.9 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score822 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 1.6 – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 315 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.651
Track start in the recording1.81 s
Compared segment2:02
Correlation0.567
Peak sharpness (PSR)117.3
Clock drift+15.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−58.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio32.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.15Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.7 dB
Recording filevideo_20261109_234336.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.3−23.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−4.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−4.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−19.8
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−26.0 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB21.1 dB
LRAloudness range5.9 dB5.9 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB15.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges82.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz71.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor75.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time94.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz85.9 %
Overall scoreweighted combination822 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.6 dB · small, match 65%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.6 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.2 dB
RMS L / R−27.3 / −25.0 dB
Peak L / R−5.6 / −4.8 dB
L/R correlation0.653
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −9.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −3.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −3.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −4.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.2 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air 0.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −8.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.