New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000180
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 15:07
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Subaru Forester Sh
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 680 / 1000
Tonal balance230 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity159 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape111 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics47 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour88 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness45 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.2 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
74.2 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong treble excess
above 12 kHz (up to +13.5 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +8.9 dB)
Slight dip
2.5 – 4 kHz (up to −4.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz 0.0 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.7 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.4 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.7 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity76.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)79.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.6 %
Dynamic similarity31.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)44.5 %
Stereo stage width143 %
Overall score680 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 12 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 12 kHz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
High: 5 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.552
Track start in the recording7.61 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.389
Peak sharpness (PSR)41.3
Clock drift+28.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−71.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio48.4 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.38Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+10.8 dB
Recording fileГолос 261109_180503.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−20.2
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−3.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−18.4
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−22.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB18.9 dB
LRAloudness range10.8 dB6.5 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB11.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance74.2 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges76.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz79.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor31.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz44.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination680 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 100%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.7 dB · small, match 64%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.7 dB · small, match 64%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+3.4 dB
RMS L / R−21.3 / −24.7 dB
Peak L / R−3.8 / −8.7 dB
L/R correlation0.605
L/R delay+0.44 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+3.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −14.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −6.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −2.7 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.7 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −1.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −3.6 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +4.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +13.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +5.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.