New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000370
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 19:03
Participant: ЮРИЙ Ц.
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 772 / 1000
Tonal balance247 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity148 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape61 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics134 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness87 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.1 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
41.0 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 100 Hz (up to +8.1 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −6.7 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +5.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.1 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.3 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.4 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity82.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)95.4 %
Dynamic similarity89.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)87.0 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score772 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 100 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.3
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
High: 6.3 – 10 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 8 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording1.95 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.494
Peak sharpness (PSR)263.3
Clock drift−4.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−63.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio47.2 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.6 dB
Recording file20261110_215948.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−12.8
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−1.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−12.2
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−15.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB14.7 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.5 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB11.1 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance41.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges82.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor89.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time95.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz87.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination772 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.1 dB · small, match 70%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.3 dB · small, match 68%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+2.2 dB
RMS L / R−14.9 / −17.1 dB
Peak L / R−1.1 / −2.0 dB
L/R correlation0.638
L/R delay+0.16 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −11.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −5.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −3.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +7.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +5.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +3.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.2 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +4.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −3.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.