New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000327
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 12:48
Participant: Robot
Car: Focus3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 661 / 1000
Tonal balance189 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity174 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape86 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics51 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour83 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness78 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
57.1 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −28.4 dB)
Strong midrange boost
160 – 400 Hz (up to +8.7 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 12 kHz (up to −9.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −22.1 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.8 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +1.5 dB slightly higher
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.1 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity63.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)86.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)82.9 %
Dynamic similarity33.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)77.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score661 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Sub: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +9…10 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 160 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…4 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)
Mid: 400 – 500 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 500 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording4.43 s
Compared segment3:21
Correlation0.092
Peak sharpness (PSR)609.3
Clock drift+1.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−64.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio51.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.78Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.9 dB
Recording fileVID_20261110_144629.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.6−10.1
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB0.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.4 dBTP0.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−6.8−8.9
RMSaverage power−12.9 dB−13.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average12.3 dB13.4 dB
LRAloudness range8.3 dB2.4 dB
DRdynamic range6.9 dB9.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance57.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges63.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz86.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor33.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time82.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz77.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination661 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −22.1 dB · significant, match 3%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.1 dB · small, match 84%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.4 dB
RMS L / R−13.0 / −13.4 dB
Peak L / R0.2 / 0.0 dB
L/R correlation0.609
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −16.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −22.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −29.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −15.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −8.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −1.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +5.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +8.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +4.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +2.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity 0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.6 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +3.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −59.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.