New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000365
LogicVer = 1
Graham Blvd
After Dark
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:47
Date: 10.11.2026 17:20
Participant: Maxxx81
Car: Ниссан хтрейл мэдбит урал бест бэленс
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 695 / 1000
Tonal balance219 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity129 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape126 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics71 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour73 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness77 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
84.2 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Lack of deep bass
below 100 Hz (up to −6.9 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 315 Hz (up to +10.2 dB)
Dip in the region
2.5 – 4 kHz (up to −8.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.7 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −2.1 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.6 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity73.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)73.5 %
Dynamic similarity47.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)76.7 %
Stereo stage width79 %
Overall score695 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 100 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 100 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Mid: 400 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.051
Track start in the recording2.69 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation−0.367
Peak sharpness (PSR)82.8
Clock drift+23.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−49.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio31.1 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.2 dB
Recording file20261110_201659.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.4−16.1
Peakmax sample level−0.4 dB−1.4 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction1.0 dBTP−1.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−6.9−13.1
RMSaverage power−11.3 dB−18.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average11.0 dB16.9 dB
LRAloudness range3.5 dB5.0 dB
DRdynamic range6.8 dB11.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance84.2 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges73.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor47.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time73.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz76.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination695 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.7 dB · noticeable, match 54%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −2.1 dB · small, match 71%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.6 dB · small, match 76%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.7 dB
RMS L / R−18.0 / −18.7 dB
Peak L / R−1.7 / −1.4 dB
L/R correlation0.820
L/R delay−0.07 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −13.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −12.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −6.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −4.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch 0.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.9 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +7.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.5 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −5.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −4.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.8 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +5.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −5.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −7.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −6.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.9 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −7.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.