New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000324
LogicVer = 1
Graham Blvd
After Dark
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:47
Date: 10.11.2026 12:45
Participant: V
Car: URV
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 626 / 1000
Tonal balance203 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity123 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape114 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics118 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour46 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness22 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.0 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
76.1 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 160 Hz (up to +13.0 dB)
Strong treble excess
6.3 – 16 kHz (up to +7.8 dB)
Dip in the region
160 – 315 Hz (up to −7.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.2 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +5.7 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.8 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)61.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)46.1 %
Dynamic similarity78.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)22.2 %
Stereo stage width32 %
Overall score626 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
High: 6.3 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 10 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
Mid: 160 – 315 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 250 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Mid: 400 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 3.15 – 6.3 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 315 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:06.960
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment1:30
Correlation0.059
Peak sharpness (PSR)146.0
Clock drift+11.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−16.0 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.8 dB
Recording fileIMG_2309.mov

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.2−12.1
Peakmax sample level−0.4 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction1.0 dBTP−0.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−6.9−10.1
RMSaverage power−11.2 dB−13.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average10.8 dB12.5 dB
LRAloudness range3.2 dB2.6 dB
DRdynamic range6.8 dB8.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance76.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz61.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor78.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time46.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz22.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination626 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.2 dB · small, match 70%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +5.7 dB · noticeable, match 39%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.8 dB · small, match 74%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.5 dB
RMS L / R−13.5 / −13.0 dB
Peak L / R−0.9 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.968
L/R delay+0.05 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −8.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −0.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.7 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +7.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +12.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +12.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body 0.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −5.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −5.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −7.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +4.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −4.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −4.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −5.6 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +4.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +5.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +7.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +4.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.