New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000120
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 09.11.2026 04:20
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 268 / 1000
Tonal balance155 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity64 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape0 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics45 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour4 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness0 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.9 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
0.0 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization0 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
Low synchronization confidence — check the track and record it again in full

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong treble excess
2.5 – 10 kHz (up to +12.9 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 200 Hz (up to −11.1 dB)
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 2 kHz (up to −11.4 dB)
Synchronization
low confidence — the result is approximate

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −4.6 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −6.5 dB strong dip
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +5.8 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity51.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)32.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)4.5 %
Dynamic similarity30.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)0.3 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score268 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 2.5 – 10 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.8
Low: below 200 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 200 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 500 Hz – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.8
High: 10 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Summary
The sound differs substantially from the original. Check speaker wiring and polarity, crossover and EQ settings, then measure again.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original3:05.022
Track start in the recording1.35 s
Compared segment0:46
Correlation0.000
Peak sharpness (PSR)5.9
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR0 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−31.1 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.92Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+17.6 dB
Recording fileRecording_2.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.3−25.5
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−16.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−16.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.4−24.6
RMSaverage power−12.0 dB−30.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average12.0 dB13.7 dB
LRAloudness range7.5 dB1.2 dB
DRdynamic range7.1 dB9.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance0.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges51.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz32.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor30.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time4.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz0.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination268 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −4.6 dB · noticeable, match 46%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −6.5 dB · significant, match 34%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +5.8 dB · noticeable, match 38%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +8.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +1.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −4.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −11.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −7.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −6.4 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −3.8 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −6.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −4.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −7.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −11.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −8.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −6.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +6.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +12.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +8.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +7.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +9.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +5.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +8.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +0.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −6.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.