New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000116
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 00:26
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 705 / 1000
Tonal balance196 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity152 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape108 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics132 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness20 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.9 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
71.7 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 5 kHz (up to −10.8 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +6.8 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +8.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.3 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.6 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −4.3 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity65.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)76.1 %
SPL (loudness contour)97.2 %
Dynamic similarity87.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)20.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score705 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 5 kHz)
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the highs and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording1.31 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.506
Peak sharpness (PSR)168.4
Clock drift+41.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−16.0 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.7 dB
Recording file22.WAV

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−12.5
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−12.3
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−15.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB15.3 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.3 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance71.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges65.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz76.1 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor87.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time97.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz20.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination705 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.3 dB · noticeable, match 58%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.6 dB · small, match 65%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.7 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −4.3 dB · noticeable, match 49%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+2.1 dB
RMS L / R−14.5 / −16.6 dB
Peak L / R−0.1 / −2.6 dB
L/R correlation0.684
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −25.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −14.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.5 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −5.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −5.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −8.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −13.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.