New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000126
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 09.11.2026 05:42
Car: Volkswagent
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 674 / 1000
Tonal balance196 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity166 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape132 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics77 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour54 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness49 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.1 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
88.3 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −6.9 dB)
Dip in the region
400 – 630 Hz (up to −10.3 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +6.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −5.4 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.3 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.4 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity65.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)82.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)53.8 %
Dynamic similarity51.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)49.4 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score674 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Mid: 400 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.151
Track start in the recording3.15 s
Compared segment3:58
Correlation0.513
Peak sharpness (PSR)124.3
Clock drift−11.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−41.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio27.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.83Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.6 dB
Recording filevolk02.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−11.9
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.5 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−0.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−7.3
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−14.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB13.7 dB
LRAloudness range9.6 dB5.9 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB8.1 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance88.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges65.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz82.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor51.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time53.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz49.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination674 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −5.4 dB · noticeable, match 41%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.3 dB · small, match 68%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.0 dB · excellent, match 85%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −21.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −3.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −4.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.6 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −3.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −8.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +2.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −6.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.