New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000140
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 09.11.2026 07:46
Car: Киа
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 642 / 1000
Tonal balance236 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity133 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape135 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics69 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour44 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness25 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.2 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
90.3 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Dip in the region
315 Hz – 1 kHz (up to −5.6 dB)
Dip in the region
2.5 – 5 kHz (up to −7.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −5.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −1.4 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.6 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.6 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity78.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)66.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)43.9 %
Dynamic similarity46.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)24.8 %
Stereo stage width130 %
Overall score642 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 315 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +2…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
Mid: 2.5 – 5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Mid: 200 – 250 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.856
Track start in the recording5.41 s
Compared segment3:57
Correlation0.369
Peak sharpness (PSR)36.4
Clock drift−49.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−56.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio37.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.26Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+5.8 dB
Recording fileRecord-4.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−16.6
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−1.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−13.2
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−19.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB17.4 dB
LRAloudness range9.5 dB6.9 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB11.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges78.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz66.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor46.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time43.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz24.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination642 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.3 dB · small, match 80%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.6 dB · small, match 65%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.9 dB
RMS L / R−18.7 / −19.6 dB
Peak L / R−1.7 / −2.8 dB
L/R correlation0.566
L/R delay+0.29 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −14.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.5 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −2.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −2.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −3.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −4.6 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence 0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +4.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −6.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −6.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −4.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −3.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −0.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.