New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000202
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 18:30
Participant: Сергей
Car: XC60
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 770 / 1000
Tonal balance214 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity149 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape139 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics94 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour92 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness82 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.9 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
92.8 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 315 Hz (up to +7.9 dB)
Slight midrange boost
400 – 630 Hz (up to +3.3 dB)
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 1 kHz (up to −5.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.4 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +5.5 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz 0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.1 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity71.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.1 %
Dynamic similarity62.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)82.1 %
Stereo stage width117 %
Overall score770 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 315 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.5
Mid: 400 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 500 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Mid: 800 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Mid: 3.15 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 800 Hz – 1 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.451
Track start in the recording2.59 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.694
Peak sharpness (PSR)144.3
Clock drift−17.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−63.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio39.8 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.34Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.8 dB
Recording fileRecord-236.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−21.9
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−3.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−3.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−19.3
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−23.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB20.3 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.3 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB13.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges71.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor62.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz82.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination770 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.4 dB · noticeable, match 48%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +5.5 dB · noticeable, match 40%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.1 dB · excellent, match 98%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.8 dB
RMS L / R−22.6 / −24.4 dB
Peak L / R−3.0 / −5.8 dB
L/R correlation0.847
L/R delay−0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −14.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +1.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +7.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +7.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.8 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.9 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.5 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.6 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +3.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.9 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.9 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +2.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.