New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000168
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 14:07
Participant: ...
Car: Test
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 651 / 1000
Tonal balance216 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity160 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape77 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics103 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour7 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness88 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.0 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
51.5 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization86 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong sub-bass excess
below 80 Hz (up to +6.9 dB)
Slight midrange boost
200 – 500 Hz (up to +4.9 dB)
Strong bass excess
100 – 160 Hz (up to +7.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +6.0 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.3 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.4 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity71.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.1 %
SPL (loudness contour)6.9 %
Dynamic similarity68.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)87.5 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score651 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Sub: below 80 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 80 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 200 – 500 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.3
Low: 100 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
High: 8 – 12 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 10 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording1.00 s
Compared segment0:29
Correlation0.459
Peak sharpness (PSR)178.1
Clock drift−3.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR86 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−16.6 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.0 dB
Recording fileVID20261109170344.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−12.9
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−0.5 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−10.6
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−15.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB15.1 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB1.9 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB9.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance51.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges71.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.1 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor68.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time6.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz87.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination651 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +6.0 dB · significant, match 36%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.3 dB · small, match 68%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.2 dB
RMS L / R−15.5 / −15.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.5 / −0.9 dB
L/R correlation0.708
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −3.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +5.5 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +6.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −4.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer 0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +3.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −94.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.