New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000200
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 17:54
Participant: Alexander
Car: Ford Mondeo
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 671 / 1000
Tonal balance184 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity151 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape139 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics107 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour88 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness2 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.0 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
92.7 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization71 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −17.4 dB)
Strong bass excess
100 – 160 Hz (up to +8.0 dB)
Slight dip
3.15 – 5 kHz (up to −4.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −4.8 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.7 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −4.6 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity61.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)75.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)88.0 %
Dynamic similarity71.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)2.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score671 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Low: 100 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
High: 3.15 – 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 4 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 400 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 3.15 – 5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 400 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass and highs for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.650
Track start in the recording2.74 s
Compared segment2:09
Correlation0.173
Peak sharpness (PSR)37.0
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR71 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−52.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio34.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.59Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+0.6 dB
Recording fileЗапись – 20261109-2051.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.3−15.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−12.1
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB17.4 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.9 dB
DRdynamic range12.3 dB11.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges61.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz75.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor71.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time88.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz2.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination671 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −4.8 dB · noticeable, match 45%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.7 dB · small, match 64%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −4.6 dB · noticeable, match 47%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.1 dB
RMS L / R−19.3 / −16.2 dB
Peak L / R−3.2 / −0.0 dB
L/R correlation0.637
L/R delay+0.32 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −15.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −1.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −5.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −4.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −7.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −10.9 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −26.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.