New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000238
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 10.11.2026 00:06
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 822 / 1000
Tonal balance232 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity162 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics110 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness86 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.0 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
91.0 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −9.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 12 kHz (up to −10.1 dB)
Slight dip
315 – 630 Hz (up to −4.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −5.8 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.4 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.2 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity77.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.3 %
Dynamic similarity73.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)85.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score822 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Mid: 200 – 250 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 315 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.151
Track start in the recording1.40 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation0.619
Peak sharpness (PSR)155.6
Clock drift+14.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−56.1 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.06Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+28.7 dB
Recording fileсдп2.WAV

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−38.8
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−24.5 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−24.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−36.0
RMSaverage power−13.8 dB−41.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.8 dB17.4 dB
LRAloudness range11.0 dB11.0 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB11.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance91.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges77.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor73.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz85.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination822 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −5.8 dB · noticeable, match 38%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.2 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+2.0 dB
RMS L / R−41.0 / −42.9 dB
Peak L / R−24.5 / −26.4 dB
L/R correlation0.542
L/R delay+0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −19.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −12.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −9.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −2.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.8 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −2.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −3.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −11.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.