New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000361
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 16:58
Participant: Chi-fi
Car: 9-3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 832 / 1000
Tonal balance227 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity160 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape141 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics113 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness94 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.6 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
94.1 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
Strong background noise — turn off the engine and ventilation, close the windows

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
63 – 125 Hz (up to +5.3 dB)
Slight treble excess
8 – 12 kHz (up to +4.3 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
below 50 Hz (up to +5.6 dB)
High noise in the recording
SNR ≈ 6.8 dB

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.1 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.8 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity75.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.5 %
Dynamic similarity75.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)94.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score832 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
High: 8 – 12 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 10 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Sub: below 50 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 50 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.7

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording2.59 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation−0.199
Peak sharpness (PSR)523.9
Clock drift−2.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−27.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio6.8 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.17Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+4.3 dB
Recording fileZOOM0003.WAV

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−18.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−15.0
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−20.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB19.7 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB5.1 dB
DRdynamic range12.3 dB13.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance94.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges75.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor75.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz94.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination832 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.1 dB · noticeable, match 51%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.8 dB · small, match 74%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.1 dB
RMS L / R−19.8 / −20.9 dB
Peak L / R−0.6 / −2.6 dB
L/R correlation0.674
L/R delay+0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +6.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +4.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +4.7 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +3.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +2.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −4.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +1.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +4.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −2.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.